Best Debugging Practices for Text-to-SQL Agentic Pipeline
Common Issues and Solutions
1. Logical Errors in Syntactically Valid SQL
- Issue: SQL can pass syntax validation but produce incorrect results
- Solution: Enhance your glossary with semantic relationships and domain-specific examples
- Example: When querying for "best selling products," the model might sort by revenue instead of units sold
- Action: Add explicit definitions in your glossary:
"best_selling": "Refers to products with highest unit sales, not revenue"
2. Model Selection Strategy
-
Primary Model: Use robust models for initial query generation (e.g., Llama 3.1-8B)
-
Specialized Models: Use dedicated models for tasks that need focused capabilities:
- Data generation: Models with strong pattern recognition
- Debugging: Models with good reasoning abilities
- Fine-tuning: Balance between performance and training efficiency
-
Practical Approach: Keep a baseline model for general use, but experiment with specialized models in components where errors persist
3. Case Sensitivity and String Normalization
- Issue: Models may struggle with case differences (
"lamini"
vs."Lamini"
) - Solution: Provide examples in your glossary showing variations
- Example Glossary Entry:
4. Business Logic Representation
- Issue: Models struggle with domain-specific calculations
- Solution: Include formulas and calculation methods in your glossary
- Example:
"sales_volume": { "definition": "Total units sold in a time period", "calculation": "SUM(units_sold) WHERE date BETWEEN start_date AND end_date", "examples": [ { "question": "What was the sales volume in January?", "sql": "SELECT SUM(units_sold) FROM sales WHERE date BETWEEN '2025-01-01' AND '2025-01-31'" } ] }
5. Preventing Overfitting
- Generate Diverse Training Data: Use multiple question generators to create varied examples
- Verify Coverage: Analyze generated data to ensure all SQL concepts are represented
- Testing Approach: Reserve truly novel questions for evaluation that weren't in training
Understanding SQL Validation Limitations
Lamini's SQLValidator
Capabilities and Gaps
The SQLValidator
uses EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
for basic validation:
-
✅ Catches:
- Syntax errors
- Missing tables or columns
-
❌ Misses:
- Runtime errors
- Logical flaws (e.g., wrong WHERE clause logic)
- Data type mismatches
- SQL dialect incompatibilities
Examples of what it can’t catch: - Data type mismatches:
- Invalid operations: - Unsupported functions:Enhanced Validation Approaches
1. Runtime Execution Validator
- Pros: Catches actual execution errors
- Cons: May timeout on large datasets or inefficient queries
- Implementation: Add timeout thresholds and sandbox execution
2. Result Validation Checker
- Limitation: Empty results may be valid (e.g., no matching records)
- Solution: Validate sample queries with known results
Systematic Error Resolution
Common Error Categories and Fixes
1. Missing Object Errors
- Issue: Queries fail due to column or table names that don't exist
- Fix: Implement fuzzy matching
2. Data Format Inconsistencies
- Issue: Format differences cause mismatches
- Fix: Provide example values in glossary
3. SQL Dialect Differences
- Issue: Functions vary across SQL dialects
- Fix: Maintain function mapping table